Drawbacks of current dose limits on intake for plutonium

«Radiation and Risk», 2017, vol. 26, No. 3, pp.46-54

DOI: 10.21870/0131-3878-2017-26-3-46-54

Authors

Vasilenko E.K. – Head of Dep. Southern Urals Biophysics Institute, FMBA, Ozersk. Contacts: 19 Ozersk road, Ozersk, Chelyabinsk region, Russia, 456780. Tel.: +7(35130) 7-02-93; e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. .
Sokolnikov M.E. – Head of Lab., MD. Southern Urals Biophysics Institute, FMBA, Ozersk.
Vostrotin V.V. – Head of Lab., C. Sc. Tech. Southern Urals Biophysics Institute, FMBA, Ozersk.
Ephimov A.V. – Head of Lab. Southern Urals Biophysics Institute, FMBA, Ozersk.
Aladova E.E. – Senior Researcher, C. Sc., Biol. Southern Urals Biophysics Institute, FMBA, Ozersk.
Romanov S.A. – Director, C. Sc., Biol. Southern Urals Biophysics Institute, FMBA, Ozersk.

Abstract

We have examined current national regulatory dose limits for occupational internal exposure and explained their weakness with reference to limits for inhalation of plutonium oxide. The purpose of the study is to analyze adequacy of standardized dose values underlying current national radiation safety standards, in order to improve radiation safety of workers contacting unsealed plutonium sources, and to set the dose limits, which allow keeping radiation risk at the acceptable social level. Our calculations show that committed effective dose from plutonium does not reflect the actual level of individual radiation exposure and potential radiation risk, because it reduces dose limit set in NRB-99/2009 (Radiation Safety Standards-99/2009) by three and more times depending on a plutonium compound and route of entry. That is why the committed effective dose cannot be used for standardization of internal dose from plutonium. Results of the study show that radiation risk coefficient depends on the age; within a working period it varies six-fold. The use of the constant tissue factor results in significant uncertainties of lifetime excess risk. Since annual excess risk associated with inhalation of plutonium oxide is formed due to exposure to lungs, we propose to consider the annual equivalent lung dose as the basic standardized dose limit, at which excess annual radiation risk is 1·10-3. Radiation internal dose from exposure due to different routes of plutonium enter can be limited using annual increment of plutonium content in a body or in a critical organ. For standardization of monofactorial radiation exposure due to contacts with plutonium special regulations for monitoring and limiting radiation doses from plutonium should be developed.

Key words
Radiation safety standards, internal exposure, 239Pu oxide, inhalation intake, social acceptable risk, annual excess risk, effective commitment dose, dose limit, critical organ, tissue fixed factor, annual equivalent lungs dose, radiation safety system.

References

1. Radiation Safety Standards (RSS-99): Sanitary standards SP 2.6.1.758-99. Moscow, Centre of Sanitary-Epidemiological Standardization, Hygienic Certification and Expert Minzdrav of Russia, 1999, 116 p. (In Russian).

2. Radiation Safety Standards (RSS-99/2009): Sanitary epidemiological rules and standards. Moscow, Federal Centre of Hygiene and Epidemiology Rospotrebnadzora, 2009, 100 p. (In Russian).

3. Radiation Safety Standards (RSS-76/87) and Main sanitary rules of work with radioactive materials and other sources of ionizing radiation OSP-72/87/Minzdrav USSR. Moscow, Energoatomizdat, 1988, 160 p. (In Russian).

4. ICRP Publication 60. Limits for annual intakes of radionuclides by workers. Moscow, Energoatomizdat, 1994, 192 p. (In Russian).

5. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 103. Ann. ICRP, 2007, vol. 37, no. 2-4, pp. 1-332.

6. Human Respiratory Tract Model for Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 66. Ann. ICRP, 1994, vol. 24, no. 1-3.

7. Age-dependent Doses to Members of the Public from Intake of Radionuclides – Part 2 Ingestion Dose Coefficients. ICRP Publication 67. Ann. ICRP, 1993, vol. 23, no. 3-4.

8. Limits for intakes of radionuclides by workers. ICRP Publication 30. Moscow, Energoatomizdat, 1982. 136 p. (In Russian).

9. Gilbert E.S., Sokolnikov M.E., Preston D.L., Schonfeld S.J., Schadilov A.E., Vasilenko E.K., Koshurnikova N.A. Lung cancer risks from plutonium: an updated analysis of data from the Mayak workers cohort. Radiat. Res., 2013, vol. 179, no. 3, pp. 332-342.

10. Vasilenko E.K., Sokolnikov M.E., Vostrotin V.V., Ephimov F.V., Aladova E.E., Romanov S.A. Limiting occupational exposure due to plutonium inhalation intake. Radiatsiya i risk – Radiation and Risk, 2015, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 51-58. (In Russian).

11. Sokolnikov M.E., Vostrotin V.V., Ephimov F.V., Vasilenko E.K., Romanov S.A. Estimates of lifetime risk of lung cancer death under different scenarios of 239Pu inhalation. Radiatsiya i risk – Radiation and Risk, 2015, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 59-69. (In Russian).

12. Sokolnikov M.E., Vasilenko E.K., Yurkin F.M., Vostrotin V.V., Ephimov F.V., Aladova E.E. Lifetime risk of death from liver and skeleton malignant tumors caused by plutonium-239 intake through injured skin. Voprosy radiatsionnoi bezopasnosti – Issues of Radiation Protection, 2016, no. 3, pp. 61-66. (In Russian).

13. Sokolnikov M.E., Vasilenko E.K.,Yurkin F.M., Vostrotin V.V., Ephimov F.V., Aladova E.E. Limit on intake of 239Pu in a human body through wound. Radiatsiya i risk – Radiation and Risk, 2016, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 109-117. (In Russian).

14. Keirim-Markus I.B. Regulation for exposure in XXI century. Med. radiologiia i radiatsionnaia bezopasnost' – Med. Radiology and Radiation Safety, 2000, no. 1, pp. 6-12. (In Russian).

15. Keirim-Markus I.B. More about regulation for exposure to radiation by human. Med. radiologiia i radiatsionnaia bezopasnost' – Med. Radiology and Radiation Safety, 2000, no. 3, pp. 41-43. (In Russian).

Full-text article (in Russian)