Radiation ecological risk for the terrestrial ecosystem in the zone close to the radioactive waste storage facility

«Radiation and Risk», 2018, vol. 27, No. 4, pp.65-75

DOI: 10.21870/0131-3878-2018-27-4-65-75

Authors

Lavrentyeva G.V.^1,2 – Associate Prof., C. Sc., Biol. Contacts: 2 Bazhenova str., Kaluga, Kaluga region, Russia, 248000. Tel. +7(4842) 77-45-05, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. .
Mirzeabasov O.A.² – Associate Prof., C. Sc., Teсh.
Synzynys B.I.² – Prof., D. Sc., Biol.
Geshel I.V.² – Researcher.

¹Bauman Moscow State Technical University (Kaluga Branch), Kaluga
²Obninsk Institute for Nuclear Power Engineering, Obninsk
³All-Russian Scientific Research Institute of Radiology and Agroecology, Obninsk

Abstract

At present ecological risk is considered as one of the tools for assessment of the environment response on exposure to the harmful agents. Hazardous effect on the environment is estimated by the response of the most sensitive components of the environment. The lowest level of a pollutant content, at which environmental changes occur, is defined as a critical load. The article presents method for estimating radiation-associated ecological risk with the use of critical loads for terrestrial ecosystems in the area around the radioactive wastes storage site in the north part of the Kaluga oblast. The area was contaminated with radionuclides as a result of leakage of liquid radionuclide wastes from the storage facility. The method for risk assessment used in the study is a modified version of the existing approach to ecologic risk measuring with critical loads for atmotechnogenic pollution. Risk assessment consists of the following 5 stages: identification of harm; identification of reference species and determinants; determination and analysis of critical loads with the use of dose-response relationship; ecological risks assessment and risk functions analysis; analysis of uncertainties. Data of long-term (2010-2015) monitoring were used for determination of the listed input parameters for risk assessment: terrestrial ecosystem is the recipient; factor of ecological hazard, ^90Sr, was found due to investigation of chemical and radioactive contaminants; the area contaminated with radionuclides was determined, it was 0.54 hectares, intensity of radiation wastes impact on the recipient was determined; reference species, mollusk, Fruticicola fruticum, and reference determinants, such as its shell height, content of proteins, metallothioneins, in soft tissues of the mollusk, critical loads for every determinants. Values of ecological risk to the ecosystem – recipient assessed for 2 reference determinants, were similar, the risk was acceptable.

Key words
Critical load, radiation risk, reference determinant, terrestrial ecosystem, mollusk Fruticicola fruticum, mollusk shell size, metallothioneins, 90Sr, risk function, uncertainties analysis.

References

1. Bashkin V.N. Ekologicheskiye riski: opredeleniya i raschety [Environmental risks: definitions and calculations]. Problemy analiza riska – Issues of Risk Analysis, 2014, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 4-5.

2. Kolesnikov S.I., Kazeyev K.Sh., Val’kov V.F. Bioekologicheskiye printsipy monitoringa i normirovaniya zagryazneniya pochv [Bioecological principles of monitoring and regulation of soil contamination]. Rostov on the Don, TSVVR, 2001. 65 p.

3. Demidova O.A. Otsenka ekosistemnogo riska pri ekologicheskom obosnovanii stroitel’stva promyshlennykh ob”yektov [Assessment of ecosystem risk in the environmental justification of construction of industrial facilities]. Ekologiya i promyshlennost’ Rossii – Ecology and Industry of Russia, 2007, no. 3, pp. 50-52.

4. Moiseyenko T.I. Metodologiya i metody opredeleniya kriticheskikh nagruzok (primenitel’no k poverkhnostnym vodam Kol’skoy Subarktiki) [Methodology and methods for determining critical loads (with reference to surface waters of the Kola Subarctic)]. Izvestiya RAN. Seriya geograficheskaya – Bulletin of RAS. Geography Series, 1999, no. 5, pp. 68-78.

5. Ovchinnikova I.N., Vasil’yevskaya V.D. Otsenka riska zagryazneniya pochv na osnove kontseptsii kriticheskikh nagruzok [Assessment of soil contamination risk based on the concept of critical loads]. Ekologicheskaya otsenka i kartografirovaniye – Environmental Assessment and Mapping, 2003, no. 6, pp. 42-49.

6. Bashkin V.N., Priputina I.V. Biogeokhimicheskiy analiz ekologicheskikh riskov [Biogeochemical analysis of environmental risks]. Problemy analiza riska – Issues of Risk Analysis, 2011, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 8-21.

7. Burns D.A., Blett T., Haeuber R., Pardo L.H. Critical loads as a policy tool for protecting ecosystems from the effects of air pollutants. Front. Ecol. Environ., 2008, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 156-159.

8. Yastrebkov A.Yu., Zakharova E.V., Kamenskiy K.A. Geological environment impact assessment of the near-surface radioactive waste storage facility of the IPPE. Razvedka i okhrana nedr – Prospect and Protection of Mineral Resources, 2014, no. 3, pp. 56-62. (In Russian).

9. Briesmeister J.F. MCNP – A general Monte Carlo N-particle transport code. Version 4C, LA-13709-M. Los Alamos, Los Alamos National Laboratory, 2000. 790 p.

10. X-5 Monte Carlo Team. MCNP – A general Monte Carlo N-particle transport code. Version 5, Volume I: Overview and Theory. Los Alamos, Los Alamos National Laboratory, 2003.

11. Lavrent’yeva G.V., Bakhvalov A.V., Synzynys B.I., Mullayarova R.R. Tekhnologiya otsenki ekologicheskogo riska dlya sukhoputnoy ekosistemy v usloviyakh khronicheskogo radioaktivnogo zagryazneniya [Technology of environmental risk assessment for the terrestrial ecosystem in conditions of chronic radioactive contamination]. Problemy analiza riska – Issues of Risk Analysis, 2012, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 30-43.

12. Lavrent’yeva G.V., Silin I.I., Koz’min G.V., Vasil’yeva A.N., Synzynys B.I., Glushkov Yu.M., Momot O.A. Dynamics of 90Sr seasonal behaviour in surface and underground water near radioactive waste storage site. Voda: khimiya i ekologiya – Water: Chemistry and Ecology, 2012, no. 12, pp. 26-31. (In Russian).

13. Kryshev I.I., Ryazantsev E.P. Ekologicheskaya bezopasnost’ yaderno-energeticheskogo kompleksa Rossii [Environmental safety of the nuclear power engineering complex of Russia). Moscow, Izdat, 2010. 495 p.

14. Andersson P., Beaugelin-Seiller K., Beresford N. A., Copplestone D., Della Vedova C., Garnier-Laplace J., Howard B. J., Howe P., Oughton D.H., Wells C., Whitehouse P. Numerical benchmarks for protecting biota from radiation in the environment: proposed levels, underlying reasoning and recommendations. PROTECT Deliverable 5. EC contract number: 036425 (FI6R). Lancaster, 2008. 112 p.

15. Sazykina T.G., Kryshev A.I., Sanina K.D. Non-parametric estimation of thresholds for radiation effects in vertebrate species under chronic low-LET exposures. Radiat. Environ. Biophys., 2009, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 391-404.

16. Kryshev I.I., Sazykina T.G. Radiation safety of the environment: request for harmonization of Russian and international regulation documents with consideration of Federal laws and new International Basic Safety Standards. Radiatsiya i risk – Radiation and Risk, 2013, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 47-61. (In Russian).

17. Lavrent’yeva G.V., Shoshina R.R., Mirzeabasov O.A., Synzynys B.I. Impact of ⁹⁰Sr on morphometric indices and metallothioneins level in the soft tissues of Bradybaena fruticum inhabiting the regional radioactive wastes storage facility. Radiatsiya i risk – Radiation and Risk, 2017, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 43-51. (In Russian).

18. Khokhutkin I.M. O nasledovanii priznaka «opoyasonnosti» v estestvennykh populyatsiyakh nazemnogo bryukhonogogo mollyuska Bradybaena fruticum (Mull.) [On the inheritance of the sign of "opioasnosti" in the natural populations of the terrestrial gastropod Bradybaena fruticum (Mull.)]. Genetika – Russian Journal of Genetics, 1979, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 868-871.

19. Majone F., Brunetti R., Gola I., Levis A.G. Persistence of micronuclei in the marine mussel, Mytilus galloprovincialis, after treatment with mitomycin. Mutat. Res., 1987, vol. 191, no. 34, pp. 157-161.

20. Golubev A., Sikorski V., Stoliar O. Ionizing radiation long-term impact on biota in water bodies with different levels radioactive contamination in Belarusian sector of Chernobyl nuclear accident zone. Radioprotection, 2011, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 393-399.

21. Frantsevich L.I., Pan’kov I.V., Ermakov A.A., Kornyushin A.V., Zakharchuk T.N. Mollyuski – indikatory zagryazneniya sredy radionuklidamiм [Molluscs are indicators of environmental pollution by radionuclides]. Ekologiya – Russian Journal of Ecology, 1995, no. 1, pp. 57-62.

22. Snegin E.A. Chemical element content in the terrestrial clam-shells under the impact of ore mining and processing enterprises. Problemy regional’noy ekologii – Regional Environmental Issues, 2009, no. 1, pp. 22-27. (In Russian).

23. Synzynys B.I., Mirzeabasov O.A., Lavrent’yeva G.V., SHoshina R.R., Momot O.A. Uncertainties in assessing radiation ecological risk for biocenosis of the regional radioactive waste storage. Radiatsiya i risk – Radiation and Risk, 2014, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 43-54. (In Russian).

24. Ivanov V.K., Korelo A.M., Panfilov A.P., Raykov S.V., CHekin S.YU., Kashcheyev V.V., Agapov A.M., Murashko A.A., Kalinina M.Yu., Maksyutov M.A., Tumanov K.A., Menyaylo A.N. ARMIR: sistema optimizatsii radiologicheskoy zashchity personala [ARMIR: system for optimizing radiological protection of personnel]. Moscow, Pero, 2014. 302 p.

Full-text article (in Russian)