Survey of potential radon hazard in the territory of Krasnokamensk, Zabaykalsky krai

«Radiation and Risk», 2025, vol. 34, No. 4, pp.28-39

DOI: 10.21870/0131-3878-2025-34-4-28-39

Authors

Kaygorodov E.I. – Jun. Researcher, PhD Student of IEG RAS. Contacts: 40 Shchukinskaya Str., Moscow, Russia, 123103. Tel.: +7(915)104-73-87; e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. .
Miklyaev P.S. – Sen. Researcher, D. Sc., Geol.-Min., Prof. of RAS, Dep. Director of IEG RAS
Gertsen G.P. – Head of Lab., C. Sc., Phis.-Math. RTC RCSH.
Petrova T.B. – Sen. Researcher, C. Sc., Tech. Lomonosov MSU.
Kiselev S.M. – Sen. Researcher of RTC RCSH, Head of Lab., C. Sc., Biol.
Shlygin V.V. – Jun. Researcher
Gubanova Yu.K. – Researcher of RTC RCSH, PhD Student. SRC – FMBC.
¹ Research and Technical Center of Radiation-Chemical Safety and Hygiene, Moscow
² Sergeev Institute of Environmental Geoscience RAS, Moscow
³ Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow
⁴ State Research Center – Burnazyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of FMBA, Moscow

Abstract

The study presents new data characterizing the potential radon hazard of territories adjacent to uranium ore mining areas, using the residential zone of Krasnokamensk as an example, located near the Streltsovsky uranium ore deposit (Zabaykalsky krai). It is revealed that the specific activity of ²²⁶Ra and ²²²Rn flux density (the decay product of ²²⁶Ra) obey the normal distribution law and vary in the range of 22.0-42.9 Bq/kg and 15-201 mBq/(m²·s), respectively. The radon flux density values for residential areas exceed the allowable level (80 mBq/m²·s according to clause 5.1.6 of OSPORB-99/2010) in 70% of cases but remain within the background values typical for this territory. The main reason for increased values of radon flux density is low humidification of the territory due to the small amount of precipitation during the year. The parameters of diffusive radon transfer, indicating high gas permeability of soils on this territory, are characterized. It is shown that the main source of radon entry into buildings is the infiltration of radon released from the soil beneath the building through enclosing structures. It is established that the greatest radon hazard is represented by the buildings of trade and public catering enterprises, built by individual projects in the late 1990s and after 2000s. Meanwhile, typical panel five-level residential buildings are characterized mainly by concentrations of radioactive gas in the air of premises, not exceeding the established hygienic standards. However, in the construction of new residential and public buildings it is advisable to assess the sufficiency of the radon-protective properties of the structures of the underground part of the project and, if necessary, provide a radon protection system to prevent potential health risks to the population and the environment.

Key words
radon, potential radon hazard, radon diffusion length, radon flux density, radiation safety, radiobiology, public health, environmental health.

References

1. ICRP, 2010. Lung cancer risk from radon and progeny and statement on radon. ICRP Publication 115. Ann. ICRP, 2010, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 1-64.

2. Sources and effects of ionizing radiation. UNSCEAR 2000 report to the General Assembly with scientific annexes. New York, United Nations, 2000. 654 p.

3. Radiation safety standards (NRB-99/2009). Sanitary rules and standards. SanPiN 2.6.1.2523-09. Moscow, Federal Center for Hygiene and Epidemiology of Rospotrebnadzor, 2009. 100 p. (In Russian).

4. Basic sanitary rules for radiation safety (OSPORB-99/2010). Sanitary rules. SP 2.6.1.2612-10. Moscow, Center for Sanitary and Epidemiological Rationing, Hygienic Certification of Russian Ministry of Health, 2010. 51 p. (In Russian).

5. Hygienic requirements to limitation of population exposure from natural ionizing irradiation sources. Sanitary rules and standards. SanPiN 2.6.1.2800-10. Moscow, Rospotrebnadzor, 2011. 40 p. (In Russian).

6. Marenny A.M., Tsapalov A.A., Miklyaev P.S., Petrova T.B. Regularities of radon field formation in the geological environment. Moscow, Pero Publ., 2016. 394 p. (In Russian).

7. Miklyaev P.S. Scientific bases for assessment of potential radon hazard of platform territories: diss. doc. sci. Geol. and Mineral. Moscow, 2015. 307 p. (In Russian).

8. Assessment of potential radon hazard of land plots for construction of residential, public and industrial buildings. Methodological guidelines. MU 2.6.1.038-2015. Moscow, FMBA of Russia, 2016. 36 p. (In Russian).

9. Marennyy A.M., Romanov V.V., Astafurov V.I., Gubin A.T., Kiselev S.M., Nefedov N.A., Penesev A.V. Survey for indoor radon in dwellings on the territories supervised by FMBA of Russia. Radiatsionnaya gygiena – Radiation Hygiene, 2015, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 23-29. (In Russian).

10. Marennyi A.M., Kiselev S.M., Titov A.V., Zolotukhina S.B., Astafurov V.I., Dmitriev V.A., Zhuravleva L.A., Marennyi M.A., Nefedov N.A., Penezev A.V., Khokhlova E.A. Survey in Krasnokamensk city on the content of indoor radon. Radiatsionnaya gygiena – Radiation Hygiene, 2013, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 47-52. (In Russian).

11. Ryzhakova N.K., Stavitskaya K.O., Udalov A.A. Issues in assessment of potential radon hazard at building sites. Radiatsionnaya gygiena – Radiation Hygiene, 2018, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 37-44. (In Russian).

12. Miklyaev P.S., Makarov V.I., Dorozhko A.L., Petrova T.B., Marennyi M.A., Marennyi A.M., Makeev V.M. Radon field of Moscow. Geoekologiya. Inzhenernaya geologiya. Gidrogeologiya. Geokriologiya – Geoecology. Engineering Geology. Hydrogeology. Geocryology, 2013, no. 2, pp. 172-187. (In Russian).

13. Karl L.E., Gubanova Iu.K., Kaygorodov E.I., Mnatsakanyan M.R. Radioecological monitoring of environmental objects on the territory with potential radon hazardousness. Proceedings the school-conference of young scientists and specialists “Ilyin Reading”, October 6-7, 2022. Moscow, SRC – FMBC, 2022, pp. 32-34. (In Russian).

14. Petrova T.B. Regularities of formation of radiation background in Moscow, caused by gamma emitting radionuclides of natural and anthropogenic origin: diss. cand. sci. tech. Moscow, 2011. 138 p. (In Russian).

15. Shandala N.K., Isaev D.V., Gimadova T.I., Kiselev S.M., Semenova M.P., Seregin V.A., Titov A.V., Zolotuhina S.B., Zhuravlyova L.A., Hohlova E.A. Current radiation situation in Krasnokamensk. Meditsinskaya radiologiya i radiatsionnaya bezopasnost’ – Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety, 2015, vol. 60, no. 6, pp. 10-14. (In Russian).

16. Berdnikov P.V., Gor'kij A.V. Study of radon hazard of the territory of St. Petersburg and Leningrad region. ANRI, 2008, no. 2(53), pp. 56-59. (In Russian).

17. Novikov G.F. Radiometric reconnaissance. Leningrad, Nedra Publ., 1989. 407 p. (In Russian).

18. Ryzhakova N.K., Ramenskaya G.A. The results of clay soils parameters determination in Tomsk on the base of volume activity measurement. ANRI, 2010, no. 4(63), pp. 42-47. (In Russian).

19. Information about houses in Russia, Zabaykalsky Krai, Krasnokamensk. Available at: https://mingkh.ru/. (Accessed 16.11.2024).

20. Yarmoshenko I.V., Onishchenko A.D., Malinovsky G.P., Vasilyev A.V., Nazarov E.I., Zhukovsky M.V. Comparative analysis of radon concentrations in buildings of different energy efficiency classes on example of five Russian cities. Radiatsionnaya gygiena – Radiation Hygiene, 2020, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 47-56. (In Russian).

21. Yarmoshenko I.V., Onishchenko A.D., Zhukovskij M.V. Survey of radon accumulation levels in residential buildings in the city of Yekaterinburg. Voprosy radiatsionnoj bezopasnosti – Radiation Safety Issues, 2010, no. 3(59), pp. 62-69. (In Russian).

22. Residential and public buildings. Regulations for designing of protection against radon. Set of rules. SP 321.1325800.2017. Moscow, Standartinform, 2018. 23 p. (In Russian).

Full-text article (in Russian)