Issues
Plutonium in plants: uptake, transport within the plant, radiation effects. Review
«Radiation and Risk», 2025, vol. 34, No. 4, pp.67-80
DOI: 10.21870/0131-3878-2025-34-4-67-80
Authors
Edomskaya M.A. – Head of Lab., C. Sc., Biol. Contacts: 109 km, Kievskoe sh., Obninsk, Kaluga region, Russia, 249032. Tel.: +7 910 5148614; e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. .Shupik A.A. – Researcher. NRC “Kurchatov Institute” – RIRAE.
Shupik D.A. – Student
Synzynys B.I. – Prof., D. Sc., Biol. OINPE MEPhI.
1 Russian Institute of Radiology and Agroecology of National Research Centre «Kurchatov Institute», Obninsk
2 Obninsk Institute for Nuclear Power Engineering, Obninsk
Abstract
Plutonium is an artificial radionuclide that poses a significant environmental hazard due to its high radiotoxicity and long half-life (24,100 years for 239Pu). Plutonium released into the environment mainly as a result of man-made activities, including nuclear tests, accidents (Chernobyl, Fukushima) and emissions from nuclear fuel cycle enterprises. The review systematizes data on the behavior of plutonium in the soil-plant system, including the mechanisms of uptake, transport and biological effects. The main factor determining the mobility of plutonium is its oxidation state (III-VI), which affects its solubility and complexation. The bioavailability of plutonium is significantly affected by soil characteristics: soil type, pH, organic matter and mineral content. The role of chelates, which form complex, stable compounds with metal ions that can increase the plutonium uptake by plants, is of particular interest. Plutonium transfer factors vary over an extremely wide range, which reflects the difficulty of predicting the amount of its uptake by plants. The mechanisms of intracellular transport of plutonium remain poorly understood. A hypothesis is put forward about the possible competition of plutonium with iron for the plant transport systems. Radiobiological effects in plants are caused by the combined action of plutonium, namely its chemical toxicity and alpha-radiation. This is expressed in the form of the occurrence of chromosomal aberrations, micronuclei and other cytogenetic disorders. Modern research methods, including genetic, cytogenetic, cytological studies and autoradiography of ultra-thin sections, are needed to gain a deeper understanding of the processes of plutonium absorption and transport inside the plant, as well as the radiation effects caused by plutonium. This will make it possible to clarify the mechanisms of the plutonium radiobiological effects at the cellular level and develop more accurate models of its behavior in the soil-plant system.
Key words
Pu, plutonium isotopes, plants, uptake, transport through the plant, soil-plant system, uptake factors, cytogenetic parameters, cytological effects, radiobiology, environmental health.
References
1. Vasilenko I.Ya., Vasilenko O.I. Plutonium. Energiya: ekonomika, tekhnika, ekologiya – Energy: Economics, Technology, Ecology, 2004, no. 1, pp. 60-63. (In Russian).
2. Thakur P., Ward A.L. 241Pu in the environment: insight into the understudied isotope of plutonium. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 2018, vol. 317, no. 2, pp. 757-778.
3. Lukashenko S.N., Edomskaya M.A. Plutonium in the environment: sources, dissemination mechanisms, and concentrations. Biol. Bull., 2022, vol. 49, no 11, pp. 2081-2107.
4. Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation. UNSCEAR 2000 report, volume I: report to the general assembly, with scientific annexes-sources. New York, United Nations, 2000. 666 p.
5. Bekman I.N. Plutonium: study guide. Moscow, MSU, 2009. Available at: http://profbeckman.narod.ru/Plu-tonSS.htm (Accessed 10.05.2025). (In Russian).
6. Handbook of parameter values for the prediction of radionuclide transfer in terrestrial and freshwater environ-ments. Technical Reports Series No. 472. Vienna, IAEA, 2010. 194 p.
7. Shupik A.A., Edomskaya M.A., Synzynys B.I., Shavrina K.E. Plutonium uptake by plants (a review). Biol. Bull., 2024, vol. 51, no. 11, pp. 3609-3617.
8. Sokolik G.A., Ovsyannikova S.V., Voynikova E.V., Popenya M.V. Current state and mobility of plutonium and americium from the Chernobyl emission in the soil and vegetation cover. Mediko-biologicheskiye problemy zhiznedeyatel’nosti – Medical and Biological Problems of life activity, 2011, vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 197-184. (In Russian).
9. Handbook of parameter values for the prediction of radionuclide transfer to wildlife. Technical Reports Series No. 479. Vienna, IAEA, 2014. 211 p.
10. Edomskaya M.A., Lukashenko S.N., Shupik A.A., Shapovalov S.G. Plutonium accumulation by vegetation on different soils. Eurasian Soil Sci., 2023, vol. 56, no. 7, pp. 944-950.
11. Watters R.L., Edginton D.N., Hakonson T.E. Transuranium elements in the environment. Moscow, Energoatomizdat, 1985. 344 p. (In Russian).
12. Zherin I.I. Chemistry of thorium, uranium, plutonium: a tutorial. Tomsk, TPU, 2010. 147 p. (In Russian).
13. Tawussi F., Gupta D.K., Mühr-Ebert E.L., Schneider S., Bister S., Walther C. Uptake of plutonium-238 into Solanum tuberosum L. (potato plants) in presence of complexing agent EDTA. J. Environ. Radioact., 2017, vol. 178-179, pp. 186-192.
14. Singh S., Fulzele D.P., Kaushik C.P. Potential of Vetiveria zizanoides L. Nash for phytoremediation of plutonium (239Pu): chelate assisted uptake and translocation. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf., 2016, vol. 132, pp. 140-144.
15. White M.G., Dunaway P.B., Howard W.A. Environmental plutonium on the Nevada Test Site and environs. No. NVO-171; CONF-760210. US Energy Research and Development Administration (ERDA). Las Vegas, NV (US), Nevada Applied Ecology Group, 1977.
16. Pinder J.E., Alberts J.J., Mcleod K.W., Schreckhise R.G. Environmental research on actinide elements. No. CONF-841142. Savannah River Ecology Lab., Aiken, SC (USA); Georgia Univ., Sapelo Island (USA). Marine Inst.; Pacific Northwest Lab., Richland, WA (USA); USDOE Office of Scientific and Technical Infor-mation, Oak Ridge, TN, 1987.
17. Molz F.J. Biogeochemical processes responsible for the enhanced transport of plutonium under transient unsaturated ground water conditions. No. DOE-ER-64401. Clemson Univ., SC (United States), 2010.
18. Wildung R.E., Garland T.R., Cataldo D.A., Rogers J.E., McFadden K.M., McNair V.M., Schreckhise R.G. Transuranic behavior in soils and plants. No. PNL--3300 (PT. 2), 1980.
19. Garland T.R., Cataldo D.A., Wildung R.E. Absorption, transport, and chemical fate of plutonium in soybean plants. J. Agric. Food Chem., 1981, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 915-920.
20. Cataldo D.A., McFadden K.M., Garland T.R., Wildung R.E. Organic constituents and complexation of nickel (II), iron (III), cadmium (II), and plutonium (IV) in soybean xylem exudates. Plant Physiol., 1988, vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 734-739.
21. Lee J.H., Hossner L.R., Attrep Jr M., Kung K.S. Uptake and translocation of plutonium in two plant species using hydroponics. Environ. Pollut., 2002, vol. 117, no. 1, pp. 61-68.
22. Molz F., Demirkanli I., Thompson S., Kaplan D., Powell B. Plutonium transport in soil and plants: an interdisciplinary study motivated by lysimeter experiments at the Savannah River site. Fluid Dynamics in Complex Fractured‐Porous Systems, 2015, ch. 13, pp. 181-208.
23. Thompson S.W., Molz F.J., Fjeld R.A., Kaplan D.I. Uptake, distribution, and velocity of organically complexed plutonium in corn (Zea mays). J. Environ. Radioact., 2012, vol. 112, pp. 133-140.
24. Zotina T., Kalacheva G., Bolsunovsky A. Biochemical fractionation and cellular distribution of americium and plutonium in the biomass of freshwater macrophytes. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 2011, vol. 290, no. 2, pp. 447-451.
25. Muratova E.N., Goryachkina O.V., Kornilova M.G., Pimenov A.V., Sedel’nikova T.S., Bolsunovskiy A.Ya. Cytogenetic study of aquatic plants of the Yenisei River in the radiation contamination zone. Izvestiya RAN. Seriya biologicheskaya – Bulletin of the RAS. Biological Series, 2014, no. 5, pp. 510-517. (In Russian).
26. Muratova E.N., Karpyuk T.V., Vladimirova O.S., Sizykh O.A., Kvitko O.V. Cytological study of Siberian larch in anthropogenically disturbed areas of Krasnoyarsk and its environs. Vestnik ekologii, lesovedeniya i landshaftovedeniya – Bulletin of Ecology, Forestry and Landscape Science, 2009, no. 9, pp. 99-108. (In Russian).
27. Voronezhskaya V., Volkova P., Bitarishvili S., Shesterikova E., Podlutskii M., Clement G., Meyer C., Duarte G.T., Kudin M., Garbaruk D., Turchin L., Kazakova E. Multi-omics analysis of Vicia cracca re-sponses to chronic radiation exposure in the Chernobyl exclusion zone. Plants (Basel), 2023, vol. 12, no. 12, pp. 2318. DOI: 10.3390/plants12122318.
28. Haque M., Binte Dayem S., Tabassum Tasnim N., Islam M.R., Shakil M.S. Biological impact of Chernobyl radiation: a review of recent progress. Int. J. Radiat. Biol., 2024, vol. 100, no. 10, pp. 1405-1415.
29. Mozolin E.M., Geras’kin S.A., Minkenova K.S. Radiobiological effects in plants and animals of the Semipa-latinsk test site (Kazakhstan). Radiatsionnaya biologiya. Radioekologiya – Radiation Biology. Radioecology, 2008, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 422-431. (In Russian).
30. Minkenova K., Serik A. Panitskiy A. Cytogenetic changes in Rosa spinosissima L. and Leymus angustus (Trin:) Pilg. growing under radioactive contamination conditions at the Semipalatinsk nuclear test site. PloS One, 2025, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. e0324860. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324860.
31. Geras’kin S.A., Minkenova K.S., Perevolotskaya T.V., Perevolotsky A.N. Cytogenetic effects in the popu-lations of dwarf feather grass from the territory of Semipalatinsk test site. Biol. Bull., 2023, vol. 50, no. 11, pp. 3096-3110.
32. Romanovskiy A.V. Comparison of cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of alpha radiation of plutonium-239 and electromagnetic radiation of a cell phone in the Allium [cepa] test. Proceeding XXI All-Russian youth scientific conference dedicated to the 70th anniversary of A.I. Taskaev “Current issues in biology and ecology”, Syktyv-kar, 7-11 April, 2014. Syktyvkar, Komi Scientific Center of the Ural Branch of the RAS, 2014, pp. 294-298. (In Russian).
Full-text article (in Russian)