Issues
Release of radioactive substances into the environment in severe accidents BN-1200M accidents: radiological protection according to international standards
«Radiation and Risk», 2026, vol. 35, No. 1, pp.5-17
DOI: 10.21870/0131-3878-2026-35-1-5-17
Authors
Ivanov V.K. – Scientific Advisor of NRER, Chief Radioecologist of Project “Proryv”, Chairman of RSCRP, Corresponding Member of RAS, D. Sc., Tech., Prof.Menyajlo A.N. – Lead. Researcher, C. Sc., Biol.
Pryakhin E.A. – Researcher
Chekin S.Yu. – Head of Lab. A. Tsyb MRRC. Solomatin V.M. – Head of Dep. of the Chief Radioecologist, Project “Proryv”, C. Sc., Biol. JSC “Proryv”. Contacts: 4 Korolyov str., Obninsk, Kaluga region, Russia, 249035; e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. .
1 Joint Stock Company “Proryv”, Moscow
2 A. Tsyb MRRC, Obninsk
Abstract
The problem of radiological protection of the population and personnel in case of possible severe accidents of the BN-1200M reactor plant is considered. A reference level of radiation-induced carcinogenic risk of 10-3 is used, corresponding to the reference level of 20 mSv for the population recommended by ICRP Publication 146 in 2020. The technology of modeling carcinogenic risk based on absorbed radiation doses in organs and tissues is used. The values of the expected effective doses were obtained when the carcinogenic risk of 10-3 is reached for radionuclides Cs, I and Na, which make the main contribution to the radiation doses to the population in the event of a beyond design-basis accident of a power unit with a BN-1200M reactor plant. It has been shown that the radiotoxicity of the isotopes 22Na and 24Na increases by 2-3 times when they are inhaled, compared to oral intake, and the radiotoxicity of 131I is tens of times less than the radiotoxicity of radioisotopes Na and Cs. When implementing the principle of optimizing radiological protection in emergency exposure situations, it is necessary to consider that the reference levels, established in terms of radiation risk, ranging from moderate (10-3) to significant (10-2), can be achieved at significantly different effective doses, depending on the dose-forming radionuclide, the route of its entry into the human body, as well as depending on the sex and age of the exposed persons.
Key words
severe radiation accident, BN-1200M reactor plant, radionuclides, Cs, I, Na, expected effective dose, absorbed dose, reference dose level, reference risk level, medical examination, environmental health, public health.
References
1. ICRP, 2020. Radiological protection of people and the environment in the event of a large nuclear accident: update of ICRP Publications 109 and 111. ICRP Publication 146. Ann. ICRP, 2020, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 1-17.
2. ICRP Publication 103. Eds.: M.F. Kiselev, N.K. Shandala. Moscow, PKF «Alana», 2009. 312 p. Available at: http://www.icrp.org/docs/P103_Russian.pdf (Accessed 30.01.2026). (In Russian).
3. Preston D.L., Shimizu Y., Pierce D.A., Suyama A., Mabuchi K. Studies of mortality of atomic bomb survi-vors. Report 13: Solid cancer and noncancer disease mortality: 1950-1997. Radiat. Res., 2003, vol. 160, no. 4, pp. 381-407.
4. Preston D.L., Kusumi S., Tomonaga M., Izumi S., Ron E., Kuramoto A., Kamada N., Dohy H., Matsuo T., Nonaka H., Thompson D.E., Soda M., Mabuchi K. Cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors. Part III: Leukemia, lymphoma and multiple myeloma, 1950-1987. Radiat. Res., 1994, vol. 137, pp. 68-97.
5. ICRP Database of Dose Coefficients: Workers and Members of the Public; Ver. 3.0, official website. Available at: http://www.icrp.org/page.asp?id=145 (Accessed 30.01.2026).
6. Menyajlo A.N., Chekin S.Yu., Kashcheev V.V., Maksioutov М.А., Korelo A.M., Tumanov K.A., Pryakhin E.A., Lovachev S.S., Karpenko S.V., Kashcheeva P.V., Ivanov V.K. Lifetime attributable risks from external and internal exposure to radiation: method for estimating. Radiatsiya i risk – Radiation and Risk, 2018, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 8-21. (In Russian).
7. Menyajlo A.N., Lovachev S.S., Chekin S.Yu., Ivanov V.K. Assessment of radiation risks from spent nuclear fuel depending on composition of radionuclides and radiation dose distribution in organs. Radiatsiya i risk – Radiation and Risk, 2019, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 26-36. (In Russian).
8. Radiological safety of the public in two-component nuclear power engineering. Ed.: V.K. Ivanov. Obninsk, 2023. 256 p. (In Russian).
9. Radiation safety standards (RSS-99/2009). Sanitary-epidemiological rules and standards. SP2.6.1.252309. Moscow, Federal Center of Hygiene and Epidemiology of Rospotrebnadzor, 2009. 100 p. (In Russian).
10. The state of public health in connection with the state of the environment and the living conditions of the population. Guidelines for assessing the risk to public health from exposure to chemicals that pollute the en-vironment. R 2.1.10.3968-23.2.1.10. Approved by Rospotrebnadzor on 06.09.2023. Available at: https://nor-mativ.kontur.ru/document?moduleId=1&documentId=480033&ysclid=mm0irh93su724748276 (Accessed 30.01.2026).
11. The Fukushima Daiichi accident. Technical Volume 4. Radiological Consequence
12. Chekin S.Yu., Kashcheev V.V., Maksioutov M.A., Menyajlo A.N., Korelo A.M., Lovas. Annex X of Technical Volume 4. Vienna, IAEA, 2015. Available at: http://atominfo.ru/files/fukus/IAEA-v4-10.pdf (Accessed 30.01.2026).chev S.S., Kashcheeva P.V. Determination of increased radiation risk group among Russian Chernobyl cleanup workers. Radiatsiya i risk – Radiation and Risk, 2021, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 147-156. (In Russian).
