A method for assessing the radiation risk of medical exposure after computed tomography scan of children and adolescents based on data from scanning protocols

«Radiation and Risk», 2023, vol. 32, No. 3, pp.5-13

DOI: 10.21870/0131-3878-2023-32-3-5-13

Authors

Kashcheev V.V. – Head of Lab., C. Sc., Biol.
Pryakhin E.A. – Researcher. Contacts: 4 Korolyov str., Obninsk, Kaluga region, Russia, 249035. Tel.: (484) 399-32-81; e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. .
Menyajlo A.N. – Lead. Researcher, C. Sc., Biol. A. Tsyb MRRC.
A. Tsyb MRRC, Obninsk

Abstract

Computed tomography (CT) scan is a fairly accurate and reliable method for diagnosing various diseases, however, based on irradiation of the patient with ionizing radiation, it can lead to an excess risk of developing malignant neoplasms. According to the safety standards of the International Atomic Energy Agency, no patient can be exposed to medical radiation unless he or she has been informed of the risks associated with radiation exposure. This requirement is also contained in the Russian Radiation Safety Standards (NRB-99/2009). Radiation risk is estimated on the basis of calculated values of equivalent doses in the patient's organs and tissues using radiation risk models of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. This article is devoted to the improvement of the method for calculating equivalent doses in the organs and tissues of patients with computed tomography scan for further assessment of radiation risks. For 15 modern computed tomography scanners, with different geometry of patient scanning, the data necessary for calculating the equivalent doses in organs and tissues based on the parameters of the children's phantom were updated. The coefficients of conversion of the surrogate measure of the patient's radiation dose for the entire CT scan study, namely, the value of the "Dose Length Product" (DLP), into the values of equivalent doses in individual organs and tissues exposed to radiation were determined. The results of the calculation are given for five typical scan areas: chest, abdomen, pelvis, head and neck. In the course of simulation numerical modeling, organs and tissues with the highest equivalent doses were determined during CT scan examinations of children and adolescents. Unlike adult patients, for children and adolescents, the dose load on the surface of the bone is significantly lower and does not stand out in any of the considered types of CT scan examinations. It should be noted that with CT scan of the cervical spine, due to the specifics of the geometry of scanning new types of tomography scanners, the dose load on the thyroid gland of boys increased. The dose conversion factors obtained in this paper with estimates of standard deviations make it possible to assess the radiation risks of children and adolescents during examinations on modern CT scanners and optimize their dose loads.

Key words
medical exposure, computed tomography, surrogate measure of the patient's dose, children, adolescents, dose conversion factor, equivalent dose, distribution of organ doses, simulation modeling, radiation risk.

References

1. Kashcheev V.V., Pryakhin E.A., Menyajlo A.N., Panin M.S., Seleva N.G., Kashcheeva P.V., Ivanov S.A., Kaprin A.D., Ivanov V.K. Radiation risks assessment of children cancer incidence based on computed tomography examination protocols. Radiatsiya i risk – Radiation and Risk, 2020, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 21-31. (In Russian).

2. Kashcheev V.V., Pryakhin E.A. Medical diagnostic imaging: radiation safety issues. Review. Radiatsiya i risk – Radiation and Risk, 2018, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 49-64. (In Russian).

3. Ivanov V.K., Kashcheev V.V., Chekin S.Yu., Menyaylo A.N., Pryakhin E.A., Tsyb A.F., Mettler F.A. Assessment of radiation risk associated with medical exposure in terms of effective and organ doses. Radiatsiya i risk – Radiation and Risk, 2012, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 8-23. (In Russian).

4. Zimatkina T.I., Malevich R.O., Volf S.B. Medical exposure of children and ways of optimization. Novosti mediko-biologicheskikh nauk – News of Biomedical Sciences, 2017, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 14-19. (In Russian).

5. The radiation doses to the Russian population in 2016: information collection. St. Petersburg, Ramzaev’s NIIRG Publ., 2017. 125 p. (In Russian).

6. IAEA Safety Standards. Radiation protection and safety of radiation sources: International Basic Safety Standards, General Safety Requirements, No. GSR, Part 3 (Interim). Vienna, IAEA, 2011.

7. Radiation Safety Standards (RSS-99/2009). Sanitary-epidemiological rules and standards. SanPin 2.6.1.2523-09. Moscow, Federal Center of Hygiene and Epidemiology of Rospotrebnadzor, 2009. 100 p. (In Russian).

8. Basic Sanitary Rules for Radiation Safety (OSPORB-99/2010). Health regulations. SP 2.6.1.2612-10. Moscow, Center for Sanitary and Epidemiological Rationing, Hygienic Certification of Russian Ministry of Health, 2010. (In Russian).

9. Kashcheev V.V., Pryakhin E.A., Menyaylo A.N., Chekin S.Yu., Ivanov V.K. Calculation of equivalent doses to organs and tissues, as well as lifetime attributable risk from typical computed tomography imaging. Radiatsiya i risk – Radiation and Risk, 2013, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 8-20. (In Russian).

10. Ivanov V.K., Kashcheev V.V., Chekin S.Yu., Menyaylo A.N., Pryakhin E.A., Tsyb A.F., Mettler F.A. Estimating personal radiation risks attributed to multiple computed tomography scanning. ANRI, 2014, no. 1, pp. 65-77. (In Russian).

11. Ivanov V.K., Tsyb A.F., Mettler F.A., Menyaylo A.N., Kashcheev V.V. Methodology for estimating cancer risks of diagnostic medical exposure: with an example of the risks associated with computed tomography. Health Phys., 2012, vol. 103, no. 6, pp. 732-739.

12. Kashcheev V.V., Pryakhin E.A., Menyajlo A.N. Methodology for estimating the radiation risk of medical exposure during computed tomography considering the uncertainties of the risk model. Radiatsiya i risk – Radiation and Risk, 2023, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 47-55. (In Russian).

13. Stamm G., Nagel H.D. CT-expo: a novel program for dose evaluation in CT. Rofo, 2002, vol. 174, no. 12, pp. 1570-1576.

14. Fujii K., Aoyama T., Koyama S., Kawaura C. Comparative evaluation of organ and effective doses for pae-diatric patients with those for adults in chest and abdominal CT examinations. Br. J. Radiol., 2007, vol. 80, no. 956, pp. 657-667.

15. Ivanov V.K., Kashcheev V.V., Chekin S.Yu., Menyaylo A.N., Pryakhin E.A., Tsyb A.F., Mettler F.A. Estimation of risk from medical radiation exposure based on effective and organ dose: how much difference is there? Radiat. Prot. Dosim., 2013, vol. 155, no. 3, pp. 317-328.

Full-text article (in Russian)