Computed tomography as a risk factor of cancer among the population of the nuclear city of Ozyorsk

«Radiation and Risk», 2023, vol. 32, No. 3, pp.109-121

DOI: 10.21870/0131-3878-2023-32-3-109-121

Authors

Osipov M.V. – Researcher. SUBI. Contacts: 19 Ozyorskoe shosse, Ozyorsk, Chelyabinsk region, 456780, Russia. Tel.: +7(351)30-7-63-09; e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. .
Southern Urals Biophysics Institute, Ozyorsk

Abstract

Exposure to ionizing radiation resulted from computed tomography (CT) examinations concerns a risk associated with potential radiation-induced cancers. Widespread use of this diagnostic method during the last decades has led to significant increase of collective dose of the world’s population. Minor dose restrictions for diagnostic X-ray procedures involve considerable “beneficial” exposure burden among CT-examined patients. Assessment of possible consequences became necessary in order to manage potential risks in terms of “benefit-harm” control. Retrospective epidemiological study has been performed using the cohort of individuals exposed to diagnostic radiation from CT. The source of information was the “CT Register” database which contains medical and dosimetric data on the population of nuclear city of Ozyorsk, including data on several potential risk factors such as gender, age at exposure, cancer anamnesis and contact with occupational radiation. Risk calculation was performed using conditional logistic regression. A hypothesis on increasing chances of developing of malignant neoplasm depending on the number of recurrent CT during the lifetime, taking into account potential confounders and the impact of reverse causation was tested. The relation between recurrent CT examinations and the subsequent malignant neoplasm (OR 1.01-1.10) can be confirmed at (1-alpha) 90%, which indicates the probable radiogenic component of carcinogenic risk. Further investigation with expanded follow-up period will facilitate accounting possible unrealized cancer cases with long latency period and improve the results of the study.

Key words
computed tomography, diagnostic radiation, X-ray, occupational exposure, carcinogenic risk, reverse causation, confounding by indication, bias error.

References

1. Ryzhov S.A., Vodovatov A.V., Soldatov I.V., Lantukh Z.A., Mukhortova A.N., Druzhinina Y.V., Druzhinina P.S. Proposals for improving the system of radiation safety in medical exposure. Part 1. Analysis of information contained in state reporting forms and information databases in Moscow. Radiatsionnaya gygiena – Radiation Hygiene, 2022, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 92-109. (In Russian).

2. Preston D.L., Sokolnikov M.E., Krestinina L.Y., Stram D.O. Estimates of radiation effects on cancer risks in the Mayak worker, Techa River and atomic bomb survivor studies. Radiat. Prot. Dosim., 2017, vol. 173, no. 1-3, pp. 26-31.

3. Shatenok M.P., Ryzhov S.A., Lantukh Z.A., Druzhinina Y.V., Tolkachev K.V. Patient dose monitoring soft-ware in radiology. Digital Diagnostics, 2022, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 212-230. (In Russian).

4. Romanov S.A., Vasilenko E.K., Khokhryakov V.F., Jacob P. Studies on the Mayak nuclear workers: dosimetry. Radiat. Environ. Biophys., 2002, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 23-28.

5. Radiation Safety Standards (RSS-99/2009). Sanitary-epidemiological rules and standards. SanPin 2.6.1.2523-09. Moscow, Federal Center of Hygiene and Epidemiology of Rospotrebnadzor, 2009. 100 p. (In Russian).

6. Little M.P., Patel A., Lee C., Hauptmann M., Berrington de Gonzalez A., Albert P. Impact of reverse cau-sation on estimates of cancer risk associated with radiation exposure from computerized tomography: a simulation study modeled on brain cancer. Am. J. Epidemiol., 2022, vol. 191, no. 1, pp. 173-181.

7. Osipov M.V., Sokolnikov M.E., Fomin E.P. Database of computed tomography of the Ozyorsk population ("CT Register"). Registration Certificate No. 2020622807. Available at: https://new.fips.ru/registers-doc-view/fips_servlet?DB=DB&DocNumber=2020622807&TypeFile=html (Accessed 22.09.2022). (In Russian).

8. Osipov M.V., Fomin E.P., Sokolnikov M.E. Evaluation of effects of diagnostic exposure using data from epidemiological registry of Ozyorsk population exposed to computed tomography. Meditsinskaya radiologija i radiatsionnaya bezopasnost’ – Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety, 2020, vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 65-73. (In Russian).

9. Hamilton L.C. Statistics with Stata (updated for version 9). Belmont, CA, Thomson-Brooks/Cole, 2006. 212 p.

10. Regression analysis by example. 4th ed. Eds.: S. Chatterjee, A.S. Hadi. New York, Wiley, 2006. 416 p.

11. Graubard B.I., Korn E.L. Predictive margins with survey data. Biometrics, 2004, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 652-659.

12. Mathews J.D., Forsythe A.V., Brady Z., Butler M.W., Goergen S.K., Byrnes G.B., Giles G.G., Wallace A.B., Anderson P.R., Guiver T.A., McGale P., Cain T.M., Dowty J.G., Bickerstaffe A.C., Darby S.C. Can-cer risk in 680,000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians. BMJ, 2013, vol. 346, pp. f2360. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.f2360.

13. Smoll N.R., Mathews J.D., Scurrah K.J. CT scans in childhood predict subsequent brain cancer: finite mixture modelling can help separate reverse causation scans from those that may be causal. Cancer Epidemiol., 2020, vol. 67, pp. 101732. DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2020.101732.

14. Berrington de Gonzalez A., Salotti J.A., McHugh K., Little M.P., Harbron R.W., Lee C., Ntowe E., Braganza M.Z., Parker L., Rajaraman P., Stiller C., Stewart D.R., Craft A.W., Pearce M.S. Relationship between paediatric CT scans and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: assessment of the impact of underlying conditions. Br. J. Cancer, 2016, vol. 114, no. 4, pp. 388-394.

15. Meulepas J.M., Hauptmann M., Lubin J.H., Shuryak I., Brenner D.J. Is there unmeasured indication bias in radiation-related cancer risk estimates from studies of computed tomography? Radiat. Res., 2018, vol. 189, no. 2, pp. 128-135.

16. Smoll N.R., Brady Z., Scurrah K.J., Lee C., Berrington de González A., Mathews J.D. Computed tomog-raphy scan radiation and brain cancer incidence. Neuro Oncol., 2023, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 1368-1376.

17. Little M.P., Wakeford R., Bouffler S.D., Abalo K., Hauptmann M., Hamada N., Kendall G.M. Cancer risks among studies of medical diagnostic radiation exposure in early life without quantitative estimates of dose. Sci. Total Environ., 2022, vol. 832, pp. 154723. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154723.

18. Osipov M.V., Ria F., Druzhinina P.S., Sokolnikov M.E. Comparative assessment of the absorbed doses resulted from occupational exposure and computed tomography. Meditsinskaya radiologija i radiatsionnaya bezopasnost’ – Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety, 2023, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 48-57. (In Russian).

19. Ivanov V.K., Kashcheev V.V., Chekin S.Yu., Menyaylo A.N., Pryakhin E.A., Tsyb A.F., Mettler F.A. Estimating the lifetime risk of cancer associated with multiple CT scans. J. Radiol. Prot., 2014, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 825-841.

Full-text article (in Russian)